Which of the following determines a no pay option in the case of a deficiency?

The determination of a no pay option in the case of a deficiency hinges on assessing not just the length of the deficient area but also considering the surrounding impact on the project. The correct reasoning is that the no pay option will include the length of the deficiency and extend an additional 50 feet on both sides. This approach is designed to account for any potential negative effects that may arise from the deficiency, ensuring that the finished surface maintains a consistent quality and performance level.

By including the additional footage, the method prevents any abrupt transitions or areas where the quality of the asphalt may be visually or structurally compromised, thus safeguarding the overall integrity of the paving work. In contrast, assessing only the depth, width, or overall thickness without this additional context would not comprehensively address how deficiencies impact the final product. This structured approach serves both the contractor's interests in claims and the project owner's need for quality assurance.